Dedicated to truth, wholesome living, loving our neighbor and walking the straight and narrow.

Thursday, February 05, 2009

Secret Societies:

The Bilderbergers


The Bilderberger group got its name from the hotel in Oosterbeek, Holland, where it met shortly after its creation in 1954. Officially it has no name: but then “officially” it doesn’t exist. In reality it is composed of more than 100 of the global power elite; international financiers, multinational bosses, and political leaders and European royalty, including Prince Charles, Queen Sophia of Spain, and Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands. The two leading power brokers are the American Rockefeller family and the European Rothschilds.

Every year they meet for four days at a secret location in Europe or the United States. The meetings are not publicised. This is because top media figures are either members or on the guest list. The publisher of the Washington Post attends every meeting and the news chiefs of the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, and TV networks have also taken part on the understanding that discussions are off the record. As french broadcaster Thierry de Segonzac put it, “the Bilderbergers are too powerful and omnipresent to be exposed.

The meetings were chaired by former Nazi SS officer Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands until his resignation in 1976 following his involvement in the Lockheed Scandal. The current chair is Lord Peter Carrington, a former British government cabinet minister and secretary general of NATO, who is connected to the Rothschild family through marriage.

Reporter Emma Jane Kirby has described the Bilderberger Group as “an extrmely influential lobbying group with a good deal of political clout on both sides of the Atlantic.” This is greatly understating their influence. A unified Europe, the Treaty of Rome, the single European currency, the ending of the Cold War, The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), the Brady plan (President Reagan’s pledge to provide $50 billion to Third World and Communist countries), and the ousting of Margaret Thatcher as prime minister of Britain because she resisted the European super state, are just a few of the ideas that materialized at Bilderberger meetings.

Like its related groups the Trilateral Commission and the Council on Foreign Relations, the Bilderberger aim is a one-world government and to promote the idea that national sovereignty is outdated and regressive. Author Neal Wilgus has described them as a “sort of unofficial CFR, expanded to an international scale.” Many critics believe they have the clout to mastermind world events and engineer policies and international projects that increase their wealth and power. If power is what they seek, then one group of politicians would be easier to bribe, corrupt, and influence than those of several countries. These high priests of globalization benefit greatly from “internationalism” since it inevitably leads to large-scale, publicly funded projects that can be used to increase the Bilderberger’s wealth and power (for example sending billions in financial aid to the former Soviet Union and then extracting natural resources at rock-bottom prices; disastrous International Monetary Fund Policies that deliberately keep Third World countries crippled and powerless).

Every year, in addition to the core membership, a few ambitious new faces are invited, selected when they are in a promising political position, dropped when they cease to be of use. Douglas Wilder, the first black United States govenor was invited when his political career looked set to go stratospheric, but in 1984 when he failed to gain more than one percent of the vote in the Democratic presidential primary, he was removed from the guest list. However, the Bilderbergers struck lucky in 1991 when they invited the governor of Arkansas, Bill Clinton, into their fold at their confab in Baden Baden, Germany. A year later he was elected president.

It is alleged that the Bilderbergers have had every president since the early 1970s in their pocket. Gerald Ford was a Bilderberger; Jimmy Carter and his vice president Walter Mondale were members of the Trilateral Commission. During the 1980 primaries Ronald Reagan said he would have nothing to do with the Trilaterals, but later appointed Trilateralist George Bush his vice president. George W. Bush was not connected to these groups, but several in his administration are Bilderberger attendees.

Former British intelligence officer Dr. John Coleman claims that the conference is sanctioned by Britain’s MI6 with authority from the Royal Institute of International Affairs (of which Lord Carrington is the president). In America, the CIA provides intelligence and security for the meetings. This isn’t surprising since the framework for the CIA—the Office of Strategic Services (OSS) was built by none other than John J. McCloy, a former Chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations, and Chairman of the Rockefeller Chase Manhattan Bank.

The fact that the police arrest and charge card-carrying journalists who attempt to expose them is clear evidence that Bilderberger meetings are more than a “private” event. The organization and security cordon surrounding them makes White House security look like the Home Guard. In Versaille the security perimeter was unprecedented and local residents had their movements restricted by Bilderberger security and the French military, although no one was given a satisfactory explanation, and nothing appeared in the press.

A member of the European Commission and Bilderberger attendee, Mario Monti, recently played down the conferences saying, “The participants attend meetings in a private capacity and the statements which they make are not binding on the [European] Commission; no resolutions are passed, no votes are taken and no political communiques are issued.” The reality is that the Bilderbergers’ off-the-record briefings are way above democracy and the law.

People of faith may be target of 'stimulus' package


Charlie Butts and Jody Brown - OneNewsNow - 2/5/2009 6:30:00 AM

The administration's economic stimulus bill needs a fix to avoid a courtroom confrontation.

Jay Sekulow, chief counsel of the American Center for Law & Justice, tells OneNewsNow there is a provision of the act that actually allows for funds to be given by the federal government in the form of grants for renovation of existing colleges and universities.

"But when you read a little bit further into this legislation, there's a specific prohibition on two things," the attorney explains. "One, if the university itself is a religiously based or faith-based institution, it does not qualify. And if the facility that is being renovated allows religious worship to take place, it also does not qualify."

Specifically, the provision reads that stimulus funds may not be used for "modernization, renovation, or repair of facilities -- (i) used for sectarian instruction, religious worship, or a school or department of divinity; or (ii) in which a substantial portion of the functions of the facilities are subsumed in a religious mission."

Under that provision, according to Sekulow, many schools would bar on-campus worship or even Bible study because it will put federal funding in jeopardy. That, he says, should raise a warning flag in a federal courthouse.

"It is unconstitutional -- and while I'm prepared to challenge it in court, and we're already working on a possibility, it really needs to be handled in the legislation," the ACLJ leader suggests. "That needs to be job one...remove this provision and get it out of the legislation."

Sekulow states that a "troubling pattern" is developing regarding the use of taxpayer money -- and that this provision is the latest example. He contrasts it with the new administration's swift move to make federal funds available for abortion-providers overseas.

"There is a priority problem in Washington," he says in a press release. "This is not what 'economic stimulus' is about. We know that the American people don't want their tax dollars used for discriminatory measures. That's why this provision must be removed now."

The attorney says if the discriminatory provision is not removed from the stimulus package and is approved and signed into law, the ACLJ will challenge it in federal court.

Stimulation of discrimination?
Mat Staver, founder of Liberty Counsel, agrees that the "anti-faith" language of the provision will censor and force people of faith from the public square.

"In order to receive stimulus money our public schools will have to expel after-school Bible clubs and weekend religious meetings," says the Christian attorney. "People who want to speak about their faith will be unwelcome in public places."

He adds that President Obama's idea of faith-based initiatives apparently is to "remove faith from all initiatives."